2002 OK CIV APP 64 - Nero v. Nero’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “Further, under the facts and circumstances of the present ease, any adjustment to Husband’s gross income for child support to his fifth, later-born child results in a reduction of Husband’s child support obligation to his four, prior children, and arguably, violates the spirit, if not the letter, of § 118(E)(20). We therefore reject this proposition.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Ameen v. Ameen

2. “The amount of any preexisting district or administrative court order for current child support for children not before the court or for support alimony arising in a prior case shall be deducted from gross income to the extent payment is actually made under the order;....”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Ameen v. Ameen

3. “Child support orders issued for prior-born children of the payor- may not be modified for the purpose of providing support for later-born children;....”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Ameen v. Ameen