Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2002 OK CR 31 - Fitzgerald v. State

2002 OK CR 31 - Fitzgerald v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
May 2017
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Sutton v. United States · McGee v. County of Orange · Chapman v. Burton Berger & Associates · Sanders v. United States · Jones v. West

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[all exhibits and a transcript of all testimony and other evidence properly admitted in the prior trial and sentencing shall be admissible in the new sentencing proceeding”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.