Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2002 OK CR 40 - McElmurry v. State

2002 OK CR 40 - McElmurry v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
1
states following
September 2023
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently September 2023 · most notably 2010 OK CR 6 - Simpson v. State (2010), Eizember v. State (2007)

1 federal appellate · 32 state decisions

200200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Illinois v. Gates · Batson v. Kentucky · Blockburger v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Res gestae are those things, events, and circumstances incidental to and surrounding a larger event that help explain it.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'requires that a defendant, first, be intoxicated and, second, be so utterly intoxicated, that his mental powers are overcome, rendering it impossible for a defendant to form the specific criminal intent ... element of the crime .'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “The prohibited 'societal alarm' argument is one that mentions crimes committed by other persons and not attributable to the defendant on trial such as arguments that the crime rate is increasing.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.