2002 Pa. Super. 111 - Hoffman v. Troncelliti’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Kemmerer v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing · Paylor v. Hartford Insurance Co. · Kmonk-Sullivan v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance · Donnelly v. Bauer · 438 Pa. Super. 78 - Berger v. Rinaldi
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Insured." Any individual residing in the household of the named insured who is: (1) a spouse or other relative of the named insured; or (2) a minor in the custody of either the named insured or relative of the named insured. "Named Insured." Any individual identified by name as an insured in a policy of private passenger motor vehicle insurance.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“While it provides no part of the basis for our decision today, it merits mention that our interpretation of the terms of the statute is consistent with the legislative purpose of reducing premium costs for motor vehicle insurance.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“We construe Section 1705(b)(2) as describing two, mutually exclusive scenarios. Such an interpretation is necessary to avoid surplusage.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.