Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2002 Pa. Super. 233 - Fitzgerald v. Kempf

2002 Pa. Super. 233 - Fitzgerald v. Kempf’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
March 2011
most recently cited

11 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Melzer v. Witsberger · 378 Pa. Super. 474 - Sonder v. Sonder · 452 Pa. Super. 497 - Calabrese v. Calabrese · Claudio v. Dean Machine Co. · Humphreys v. DeRoss

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A trial court’s determination regarding a child support award will not be disturbed absent an abuse of discretion. An abuse of discretion occurs if insufficient evidence exists to sustain a support award, if the trial court overrides or misapplies existing law, or if the judgment exercised by the trial court is manifestly unreasonable.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.