2002 Pa. Super. 292 - Commonwealth v. Magliocco’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
December 2010
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Carmell v. Texas · In Re Nomination Petition of Wesley · Commonwealth v. Sullivan · Commonwealth v. McGrogan · Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Van Youngman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“§ 2710. Ethnic intimidation (a) OFFENSE DEFINED. — A person commits the offense of ethnic intimidation if, with malicious intention toward the actual or perceived race, color, religion, national origin, ancestry, mental or physical disability, sexual orientation, gender or gender identity of another individual or group of individuals, he commits an offense under any other provision of this article or under Chapter 33 (relating to arson, criminal mischief and other property destruction) exclusive of section 3307 (relating to institutional vandalism) or under section 3503 (relat ing to criminal trespass) with respect to such individual or his or her property or with respect to one or more members of such group or to their property. (c) DEFINITION. — -As used in this section “malicious intention” means the intention to commit any act, the commission of which is a necessary element of any offense referred to in subsection (a) motivated by hatred toward the actual or perceived race, color, religion or national origin, ancestry, mental or physical disability, sexual orientation, gender or gender identity of another individual or group of individuals.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“§ 907. Possessing instruments of crime (a) CRIMINAL INSTRUMENTS GENERALLY. — A person commits a misdemeanor of the first degree if he possesses any instrument of crime with intent to employ it criminally.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““Anything commonly used for criminal purposes and possessed by the actor under circumstances not manifestly appropriate for lawful uses it may have.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.