2002 Pa. Super. 330 - Commonwealth v. Bender’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
March 2012
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Oliver v. United States · United States v. White · United States v. Caceres · United States v. District Court · Blystone v. Pennsylvania
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the Commonwealth has an absolute right of appeal to the Superior Court to test the validity of a pre-trial suppression order” where it makes the required Pa.R.A.P. 311(d) certification) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). . The Commonwealth filed its concise statement of errors complained of on appeal, pursuant to Pennsylvania Rule of Appellate Procedure 1925(b), on May 2, 2011. The suppression court filed a 1925(a) opinion on August 15, 2011. . Appellee urges us to use the test set forth in Casuccio, supra, which requires, inter alia, that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.