2002 Pa. Super. 351 - Commonwealth v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
April 2008
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 426 Pa. Super. 362 - Commonwealth v. Sanders · Grabowski v. Quigley · Commonwealth v. Coon · 370 Pa. Super. 42 - Commonwealth v. Young
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“with intent to cause public inconvenience, annoyance or alarm, or recklessly creating a risk thereof, [s]he: (1) engage[d] in fighting or threatening, or in violent or tumultuous behavior,” or used”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.