2002 Pa. Super. 378 - Commonwealth v. Johns’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
April 2007
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 429 Pa. Super. 1 - Boyle v. Steiman · 454 Pa. Super. 428 - Commonwealth v. Yager · Commonwealth v. Martinez · Neve v. Insalaco's · 442 Pa. Super. 298 - Commonwealth v. Lassen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]hen considering a petition to withdraw a plea submitted to a trial court after sentencing [based on counsel's ineffectiveness], it is well-established that a showing of prejudice on the order of manifest injustice is required before withdrawal is properly justified.” Commonwealth v. Johns, 812 A.2d 1260, 1262 (Pa.Super.2002) (citation omitted). This standard”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.