Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2002 Pa. Super. 52 - Mazlo v. Kaufman

2002 Pa. Super. 52 - Mazlo v. Kaufman’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
April 2015
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Dilliplaine v. Lehigh Valley Trust Co. · Commonwealth v. Clair · McKnight v. Commonwealth · 364 Pa. Super. 521 - Commonwealth v. Gordon · Takes v. Metropolitan Edison Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Claims which have not been raised in the trial court may not be raised for the first time on appeal. Our Supreme Court has frequently stressed the necessity of raising claims at the earliest opportunity, ... [to] eliminat[e] the possibility that an appellate court will be required to expend time and energy reviewing claims on which no trial ruling has been made.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.