Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2002 Pa. Super. 9 - Commonwealth v. Conaway

2002 Pa. Super. 9 - Commonwealth v. Conaway’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
July 2023
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently July 2023

8 state decisions

60200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Commonwealth v. Harper · Commonwealth v. Simpson · 421 Pa. Super. 233 - Commonwealth v. Torres · 2000 Pa. Super. 293 - Commonwealth v. Aguado · 392 Pa. Super. 583 - Commonwealth v. Ramos

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The trier of fact may infer that the defendant intended to deliver a controlled substance from an examination of the facts and circumstances surrounding the case. Factors to consider in determining whether the drugs were possessed with the intent to deliver include the particular method of packaging, the form of the drug, and the behavior of the defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.