Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2002 SD 1 - Hansen v. Kjellsen

Hansen v. Kjellsen’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
December 2007
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Imbler v. Pachtman · Butz v. Economou · Briscoe v. W · Forrester v. White · Brody v. Guercio

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A motion to dismiss under SDCL 15 — 6— 12(b) tests the legal sufficiency of the pleading, not the facts which support it. For purposes of the pleading, the court must treat as true all facts properly pled in the complaint and resolve all doubts in favor of the pleader. “Our standard of review of a trial court’s grant or denial of a motion to dismiss is the same as our review of a motion for summary judgment — is the pleader entitled to judgment as a matter of law?””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The report of a presentence investigation shall contain any prior criminal record of the defendant and such information about his characteristics, his financial condition, and the circumstances affecting his behavior as may be helpful in imposing sentence or in granting probation or in the correctional treatment of the defendant, and such other information as may be required by the court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.