Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

2002 S.D. 101

State v. KORTH AND STEELE

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 14, 2002

South Dakota Supreme Court · decided 2002-08-14

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2002-08-14

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently August 2023

16 state decisions

80200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

SABERS, Justice

¶1(dissenting).

¶2[¶ 22.] I think we are unnecessarily complicating this matter and these cases.

¶3[¶ 23.] If an appeal has merit, file a merit brief.

¶4[¶ 24.] If an appeal has no merit, file an adequate Anders brief and keep your client informed of same.

¶5[¶ 25.] It is not necessary to file a motion to withdraw in either case.

¶6[¶ 26.] In both of these cases, we should simply require counsel to file adequate Anders briefs so that we can decide both cases on the merits.

/2002/sd/101 · .json · Public domain