Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2002 SD 135 - Bunkers v. Jacobson

Bunkers v. Jacobson’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
December 2023
most recently cited

2 district · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently December 2023

2 district · 12 state decisions

70200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Schipper v. Levitt & Sons, Inc. · Bock v. Perkins · Waggoner v. Midwestern Development, Inc. · Malcolm v. Malcolm · Drier v. Perfection, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Any person who is entitled to recover damages, whether in the principal action or by counterclaim, cross claim, or third-party claim, is entitled to recover interest thereon from the day that the loss or damage occurred, except during such time as the debtor is prevented by law, or by act of the creditor, from paying the debt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.