Full House, Inc. v. Stell’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[¶ 33.] As to the grant of costs and disbursements to a prevailing party, this Court has stated: A [circuit] court is not required to grant recovery for disbursements simply because a party has achieved the status of a prevailing party. While SDCL 15-17-37 grants no discretion, SDCL 15-17-52 allows a court to”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. DeHaven v. Hall · Hewitt v. Felderman

2. “costs of telephone hearings, costs of telephoto or fax charges, fees of witnesses, interpreters, translators, officers, printer, service of process, filing, expenses from telephone calls, copying, costs of original and copies of transcripts and reporter’s attendance fees, court appointed experts!.]”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. DeHaven v. Hall

3. “If a party wishes to have disbursements and costs of the action assessed, that party must file an application for the taxation of costs.... The application shall include a statement in detail of the costs and disbursements claimed and shall be verified by affidavit. (Emphasis added).”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. DeHaven v. Hall