Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2002 SD 148 - State v. Downing

State v. Downing’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
5
states following
August 2020
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently August 2020

15 state decisions

80200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on People v. Irrizari · State v. Rhines · State v. Guthrie · United States v. Gonzales-Benitez · State v. Larkin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““When reviewing sufficiency of the evidence, this [C]ourt, considers the evidence in a light most favorable to the verdict.” A guilty verdict will not be set aside if the state’s evidence and all favorable inferences that can be drawn therefrom support a rational theory of guilt.” “We do not resolve conflicts in the evidence, pass on the credibility of the witnesses, determine the plausibility of an explanation, or weigh the evidence.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Theft is grand theft, if: (1) The value of the property stolen exceeds five hundred dollars; * * * Theft in all other cases is petty theft. Grand theft is a Class 4 felony.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “original writing, recording, or photograph is required”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.