Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2002 SD 23 - Johnson v. Powder River Transportation

Johnson v. Powder River Transportation’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 2021
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 402 (§ 202 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Sharp v. Sharp · Petersen v. Hinky Dinky · Spitzack v. Berg Corp. · Berger v. F.O. · Tischler v. United Parcel Service

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In case of total disability as defined in subdivision 62-4-6(23), compensation shall be paid at the rate provided by § 624-3 for life with an annual increase in the amount of the benefit allowance for each year commencing on the July first that is at least twelve months following the date on which the benefit was first payable equal to one hundred percent of the annual percentage change in the consumer price index for urban wage earners and clerical workers as computed by the United States Department of Labor for the prior calendar year, not to exceed a three percent increase compounded annually. For injuries occurring on or after July 1, 1993, if an employee is entitled to compensation under this section and is also receiving old-age insurance benefits under section 202 of the Social Security Act ( 42 U.S.C., § 402 ), the compensation payable shall be a sum equal to one hundred fifty percent of the compensation payable under § 62-4-7 less the old-age insurance benefit under § 202 of the Social Security Act ( 42 U.S.C., § 402 ). However, benefits payable by the employer may not exceed the amount payable pursuant to § 62-4-7. This section does not apply to any person who is entitled to old-age insurance benefits at the time of the injury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “While this is a matter of substantial importance, this is not a matter of existing emergency. Given the situation as it is presented on appeal, we do not reach the issue. The people have a right to present their arguments, and that opportunity is waiting.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.