State v. Horse’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
8 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 25 U.S.C. § 2804
Relies on Samuel Worcester v. The State of Georgia · DeCoteau v. District County Court for the Tenth Judicial District · Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Berthold Reservation v. Wold Engineering, P. C. · In re Watson · 47 Ill. 2d 23 - The PEOPLE v. Zepeda
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]hile we do not hold that a juvenile has a per se right to consult with a parent, guardian, or custodian before questioning or to have such persons present during questioning, we do hold that notice to a parent, guardian, or custodian and a child's opportunity to confer with such persons are significant factors in evaluating the voluntariness of a statement or confession under the totality of the circumstances.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.