Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2002 SD 50 - State v. Holway

State v. Holway’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
August 2011
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 21 U.S.C. § 857

Relies on Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc. · Posters 'N' Things, Ltd. v. United States · State v. Knecht · State v. Buchholz · State v. Karlen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In determining the sufficiency of the evidence on review, the question presented is whether there is evidence in the record which, if believed by the fact finder, is sufficient to sustain a finding of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. In this review, we must accept that evidence, and the most favorable inferences to be fairly drawn therefrom, which will support the verdict. In determining the sufficiency of the evidence, this Court will not resolve conflicts in the evidence, pass on the credibility of witnesses, or weigh the evidence. No guilty verdict will be set aside if the evidence, including circumstantial evidence and reasonable inferences drawn therefrom, sustains a reasonable theory of guilt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.