Thieman v. Bohman’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
12
cited by 12 later decisions
3
states following
December 2017
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Kroupa v. Kroupa · Weitzel v. Felker · Kapp v. Hansen · Bergin v. Bistodeau · Smith v. Albrecht
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“There are three classes of parties to an action by equity: "Formal parties," who may be omitted at the option of the complainant; "necessary parties," who have an interest in the controversy, and should ordinarily be joined unless their interests are separable so that the court can, without injustice, proceed in their absence; and "indispensable parties," whose interest is such that a final decree cannot be entered without affecting them, or that termination of controversy in their absence would be inconsistent with equity.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“While the trial court indicated that [the plaintiff] was not attempting to force City to maintain the alley/road, that is the effect of declaring it to be a dedicated public alley/ road.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.