Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2002 UT 1 - State v. Jones

State v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
April 2020
most recently cited

3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently April 2020

3 state decisions

10200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. James · State v. Standiford · State v. Bell · Stephens v. Bonneville Travel, Inc. · Thacker v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'[iln establishing the nexus between intent and act it must be borne in mind that an attempt transcends intent, yet fails to culminate in its planned accomplishment.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.