Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2002 UT 113 - State v. Blake

State v. Blake’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
4
states following
April 2025
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently April 2025 · most notably State v. Lenkart (2011), State v. Gonzales (2005)

26 state decisions

110200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Davis v. Alaska · State v. Knight · Brown v. State · State v. Cardall · Riddle v. Perry

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Wlhen the request is a general one, such as [a] request ... for any impeachment material that might happen to be found in the privileged records, a court ought not to grant in camera review. At a minimum, specific facts must be alleged. These might include references to records of only certain counseling sessions, which are alleged to be relevant, independent allegations made by others that a victim has recanted, or extrinsic evidence of some disorder that might lead to uncertainty regarding a victim's trustworthiness.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'relevant to an issue of the physical, mental, or emotional condition of the patient in any proceeding in which that condition is an element of any claim or defense.'”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “is deliberate and prudent in light of the sensitivity of these types of records and the worsening of under-reporting problems in the absence of a strong privilege.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.