Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2002 UT 124 - State v. Shumway

State v. Shumway’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
1
states following
June 2025
most recently cited

34 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently June 2025 · most notably State v. Low (2008), State v. Workman (2005)

34 state decisions

260200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Benner v. Ohio · State v. Dunn · State v. Menzies · State v. Bishop · State v. Petree

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the evidence and all inferences which may reasonably be drawn from it in the light most favorable to the verdict of the jury.”
    13 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[i]t is an affirmative defense ... that the defendant caused the death of another or attempted to cause the death of another ... under the influence of extreme emotional distress for which there is a reasonable explanation or excuse.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “"[Nlotwithstanding the presumptions in favor of the jury's decision[,}] this Court still has the right to review the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict. The fabric of evidence against the defendant must cover the gap between the presumption of innocence and the proof of guilt. In fulfillment of its duty to review the evidence and all inferences which may reasonably be drawn from it in the light most favorable to the verdict, the reviewing court will stretch the evidentiary fabric as far as it will go. But this does not mean that the court can take a speculative leap across a remaining gap in order to sustain a verdict."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.