Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2002 UT 125 - State v. Hansen

State v. Hansen’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

81
cited by 81 later decisions
6
states following
November 2024
most recently cited

80 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 81 later decisions — most recently November 2024 · most notably State v. Hamilton (2003), State v. Levin (2006)

80 state decisions

380200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · United States v. Leon · Mapp v. Ohio · Florida v. Royer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 81 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “' [a]ny further temporary detention' for investigative questioning after fulfilling the original purpose for the traffic stop constitutes an illegal seizure, unless an officer has probable cause to arrest or a reasonable suspicion of a further illegality.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “If so, we then consider whether the resulting detention was ' "reasonably related in seope to the circumstances that justified the interference in the first place.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[A] seizure within the meaning of the [F]ourth [A]mendment does not occur when a police officer merely approaches an individual on the street and questions him, if the person is willing to listen. However, the person approached is not required to answer the officer's questions ....”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.