Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2002 UT 128 - Thomas v. State

Thomas v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
October 2024
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently October 2024

8 state decisions

40200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gerstein v. Pugh · State v. Thomas · Alta Industries, Ltd. v. Hurst · State v. Schreuder · Bundy v. Deland

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'cured if the defendant is later convicted beyond a reasonable doubt.'”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “the record is reviewed in the light most favorable to the findings and judgment and will not be reversed 'if there is a reasonable basis therein to support the trial court's refusal to be convinced that the writ should be granted.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “'we will set aside the district court's findings of fact only if they are clearly erroneous, and we review its conclusions of law for correctness.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.