Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2002 UT 18 - Applied Medical Technologies, Inc. v. Eames

Applied Medical Technologies, Inc. v. Eames’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
4
states following
August 2025
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently August 2025

4 federal appellate · 14 state decisions

90200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miller v. USAA Casualty Insurance Co. · State v. Lusk · Associated General Contractors v. Board of Oil, Gas & Mining · In re Evans · Featherstone v. Schaerrer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Given that choses in action are amenable to execution under rule 69(F), it follows that a defendant can purchase claims, ie., choses in action, pending against itself and then move to dismiss those claims.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[after claims have been sold, a new party steps into the shoes of the former plaintiff, and the claims remain cognizable, but the sale cuts off the former plaintiff's right to pursue those claims. Once acquired by another, the new litigant has the right to determine the course and seope of the litigation of the claims purchased, including the right to move to dismiss the pending claims.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[uJnless the execution otherwise directs, the officer must execute the writ against the non-exempt property of the judgment debtor by levying on a sufficient amount of property, if there is sufficient property; collecting or selling the choses in action and selling the other property in the manner set forth herein.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.