Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2002 UT 29 - State v. Casey

State v. Casey’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
3
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently August 2024

15 state decisions

70200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Emmett · State v. Saunders · In Re Worthen · State v. Herrera · State v. Ostler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “serutinize the plain meaning of the constitutional provision. We need not inquire beyond the plain meaning of the amendment unless we find it ambiguous.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “As with our constitutional analysis, we look first to the plain meaning of the statute[ ] and go no further unless [it is]} ambiguous.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[TJhe court reaffirmed the plea only after having accepted [the victim's] and his mother's testimony, and permitting argument by his counsel.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.