State v. Martin’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
30 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently November 2025 · most notably State v. Allen (2005), State v. Davis (2013)
30 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Dunn · State v. Holgate · State v. Rimmasch · State v. James · State v. Workman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he standard for determining the relevancy of evidence is very low, and even evidence with the slightest probative value is relevant.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“(1) [the evidence] must be such as could not with reasonable diligence have been discovered and produced at the trial; (2) it must not be merely cumulative; [and] (8) it must be such as to render a different result probable on the retrial of the case.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Kooyman · State v. Alzaga“any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action more probable or less probable than it would be without the evidence”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.