Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2002 UT 36 - Bishop v. GenTec Inc.

Bishop v. GenTec Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
2
states following
March 2026
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently March 2026 · most notably Daniels v. Gamma West Brachytherapy, LLC (2009), State v. Rodrigues (2009)

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 22 state decisions

160200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Barnett Bank of Marion County, N. A. v. Nelson · United States v. Stauffer · Hyde v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc. · Blue Cross and Blue Shield v. State · Schurtz v. BMW of North America, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'In this broad approach to correctability ..., it matters little whether an error was made by the court clerk, the jury foreman, counsel, a party, or the judge himself;”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “'courts must consider whether the ... statute's structure and purpose or nonspecific statutory language nonetheless reveal a clear, but implicit, pre-emptive intent.!”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[P lroof of a defect under a negligent manufacture theory will necessitate proof that the defective condition of the product was the result of negligence....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.