Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2002 UT 38 - Holmes Development, LLC v. Cook

Holmes Development, LLC v. Cook’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

53
cited by 53 later decisions
1
states following
November 2024
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 49 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently November 2024 · most notably Menzies v. Galetka (2006), WebBank v. American General Annuity Service Corp. (2002)

1 federal appellate · 49 state decisions

260200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Thomason v. Nachtrieb · City of Beaumont v. Moore · Maria Del Carmen Calderon v. Kansas Department of Social and Rehabilitation Services · Glenn v. First National Bank in Grand Junction · Bair v. Axiom Design, L.L.C.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A plaintiff cannot amend the complaint by raising novel claims or theories for recovery in a memorandum in opposition to a motion to dismiss or for summary judgment because such amendment fails to satisfy Utah's pleading requirements.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[a motion] for leave to amend must be accompanied by a memorandum of points and authorities in support and by a proposed amended complaint.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and ... the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.