State v. Honie’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
32 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2025 · most notably State v. Maestas (2012), Archuleta v. Galetka (2011)
32 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Gregg v. Georgia · Kolender v. Lawson · Yick Wo v. Hopkins · Payne v. Tennessee · Zant v. Stephens
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“On appeal, the appellant is required to clearly define the issues and provide accompanying argument and authority; a reviewing court is not simply a depository in which the appealing party may dump the burden of argument and research.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage“a defendant must demonstrate either (1) that the statute[] doles] not provide 'the kind of notice that enables ordinary people to understand what conduct [is prohibited], or (2) that the statute[ ] 'encourage{[s] arbitrary and discriminatory enforcement.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“'we review the evidence and all reasonable inferences drawn therefrom in a light most favorable to the verdict”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Greene · State v. Maestas
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.