Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2002 UT 51 - State v. Telford

State v. Telford’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
March 2025
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently March 2025

21 state decisions

130200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Brooks · Padilla v. Utah Bd. of Pardons and Parole · State v. Babbel · CPL (DELAWARE) LLC v. Conley · State v. Clark

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “) because the claims at issue clearly failed on their merits, id. 16 (rejecting claims under the Sixth Amendment and article I, section 12 of the Utah Constitution on the ground that these provisions provided”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The accomplice liability provision requires the fact find er to determine that the accomplice had the same mental state as the person who directly committed the crime.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “`because an illegal sentence is void and, like issues of jurisdiction, [may be raised] at any time.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.