Bailey v. Bayles’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 153 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 158 later decisions — most recently November 2025 · most notably Jensen v. IHC Hospitals, Inc. (2003), State v. Martinez-Castellanos (2018)
2 federal appellate · 153 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Pena · State v. Menzies · State v. Thurman · State v. Wood · World Peace Movement of America v. Newspaper Agency Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 158 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“any legal ground or theory apparent on the record.”
51 later decisions quote this exact passage“"The appellate court is entrusted with ensuring legal accuracy and uniformity and should defer to the trial court on factual matters." It is inappropriate for an appellate court to disregard the trial court's findings of fact and to assume the role of weighing evidence and making its own findings of fact.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“a substantial likelihood of immediate danger of abuse or domestic violence”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Patole v. Marksberry · N.D. v. A.B.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.