Julian v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
May 2017
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 171 Ill. 2d 475 - People v. Washington · Jones v. State · Summerville v. Warden, State Prison · State v. James · Stuart v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“substantial likelihood of a different result on retrial,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Mulder v. State · Lynch v. State“Under our case law ... the fact that one or more witnesses have not recanted does not automatically mean that there is not a substantial likelihood of a different result on retrial.”). However, Julian analyzed this question under the standard that existed”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Mulder v. State“the newly discovered material evidence demonstrates that no reasonable trier of fact could have found the petitioner guilty of the offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lynch v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.