Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2002 UT 72 - Wickham v. Galetka

Wickham v. Galetka’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
May 2017
most recently cited

15 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · State v. Dunn · State v. Templin · Parsons v. Barnes · State v. Boyd

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a defendant must show (1) that counsel's performance was so deficient as to fall below an objective standard of reasonableness and (2) that but for counsel's deficient performance there is a reasonable probability that the outcome of the trial would have been different.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(allthough the new evidence offered by [the defendant] may have strong impeachment value-even to the point of calling into question a witness's ered-ibility-the strength of the evidence does not change the fact that it is being offered solely for impeachment purposes.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Under the Act, a person who has been convicted and sentenced for a criminal offense may file a civil action for post-conviction relief to vacate or modify the conviction or sentence”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.