Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2002 UT 87 - State v. Calliham

State v. Calliham’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
2
states following
January 2024
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently January 2024

16 state decisions

80200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Pointer v. Texas · Alford v. United States · Delaware v. Fensterer · State v. Pena

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'[TJrial judges retain wide latitude ... to impose reasonable limits on ... cross-examination{, for tlhe Confrontation Clause guarantees an opportunity for effective cross-examination, not cross-examination that is effective in whatever way, and to whatever extent, the defense might wish”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “he, his brother, and his girlfriend took the victim on a road between Monticello and the Colorado state line and shot him 19 times”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “'wide latitude in exposing a witness' potential bias, the right of cross-examination is not without limitation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.