State v. Cramer’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently June 2023
16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Pennsylvania v. Ritchie · State v. Hufford · People v. Stanaway · Commonwealth v. Bishop · State v. James
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Article I, Section 7 of the Utah Constitution guarantees an accused the right to due process of law. Due process includes, among other things, the opportunity to submit evidence, examine and cross-examine witnesses.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“not included in the appellate record, we presume that the trial court correctly determined that none of the records [were] material to Cramer's defense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Cramer v. State“did not provide the trial court with evidence that [the witness] changed his testimony”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Curtis
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.