State v. Weeks’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
1 district · 28 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently July 2025 · most notably State v. Maestas (2012), State v. Ogden (2018)
1 district · 28 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Williams v. People of State of New York · State v. Sanwick · Crookston v. Fire Insurance Exchange · State v. Brown · Brookside Mobile Home Park, Ltd. v. Peebles
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In our view, subsection 76-3-201(4)(d)(i) does not require that a sentencing court reference on the record the factors listed in subsections 76-3-201(8)(b) and (c). Rather, it merely states that the sentencing court set forth the reasons for its restitution decision in the record.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Smith“the rules of evidence do not apply to a restitution hearing,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.