Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2002 UT App 127 - State v. Marquez

2002 UT App 127 - State v. Marquez’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
April 2003
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Holgate · State v. Thomas · State v. Jaeger · State v. Gamblin · State v. Scheel

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “argument shall contain the contentions and reasons of the appellant with respect to the issues presented, including the grounds for reviewing any issue not preserved in the trial court, with citations to the authorities, statutes, and parts of the record relied on.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.