2002 UT App 175 - State v. Waldron’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 2009
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Dunn · State v. Petree · West Valley City v. Majestic Investment Co. · State v. Saunders · State v. Brown
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“must marshal the evidence in support of the verdiet and then demonstrate that the evidence is insufficient when viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“remarks 'call[ ] to the jurors' attention matters which they would not be justified in considering in reaching a verdict'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Because [Defendant] did not object to the comments during the trial, we review this issue for plain error.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.