2002 UT App 18 - State v. Cannon’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
June 2014
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Purkett v. Elem · State v. Colwell · State v. Cantu · State v. Higginbotham
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“permitted to exercise their peremptory challenges for virtually any reason, or for no reason at all.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“parties in a criminal action may not discriminate against potential jurors by exercising peremptory challenges solely on the basis of race.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“(1) neutral, (2) related to the case being tried, (3) clear and reasonably specific, and (4) legitimate,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.