2002 UT App 190 - State v. Brake’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
November 2004
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · New York v. Class · State v. Schlosser · State v. Carter · State v. Harmon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“([a] trial court's factual findings are reviewed deferentially under the clearly erroneous standard, and its conclusions of law are reviewed for correctness with some discretion given to the application of the legal standards to the underlying factual findings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Brake“discovered that ... due to the darkness and fogged up windows, he was unable to see clearly into the Nissan's backseat to identify the passengers sitting in the backseat.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Brake“'focused in its objective and no more intrusive than necessary to fulfill that objective.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Brake
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.