2002 UT App 195 - State v. Bunting’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently January 2024
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Colorado v. Connelly · Frazier v. Cupp · Withrow v. Williams · Clanton v. Cooper · State v. Galli
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“incriminating statements he made during the interview [with police, which] were the involuntary product of coercion, violating his right to due process under the Fourteenth Amendment and right to protection from compelled self-incrimination under the Fifth Amendment [to] the United States Constitution.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[UJnder the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, ° "certain interrogation techniques, either in isolation or as applied to the unique characteristics of a particular suspect, are so offensive to a civilized system of justice that they must be condemned.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[sItanding alone, [the false friend] technique is not sufficiently coercive to produce an involuntary confession, but may be significant in relation to other tactics and factors.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.