Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2002 UTAPP 281 - Lee v. Sanders

Lee v. Sanders’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
October 2019
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Colman v. Colman · Land v. Land · Combe v. Warren's Family Drive-Inns, Inc. · Keller v. Southwood North Medical Pavilion, Inc. · In RE BEHM'S ESTATE. BEHM v. Gee

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[iJmplied consent to try an issue may be found where one party raises an issue material to the other party's case or where evidence is introduced without objection, [and] where it appear{s] that the parties understood the evidence [was] to be aimed at the unpleaded issue.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Whether an issue was properly before the trial court presents a question of law, which we review for correctness.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “A trial court's findings should fit within the framework of the petition as originally drawn, or as amended and should be supported by the evidence presented,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.