Brigham City v. Stuart’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
November 2017
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Pena · Bailey v. Bayles · State v. Archambeau · Willey v. Willey · 2002 UT App 219 - State v. Comer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'a party ... fails to bring an issue to the [juvenile] court's attention,”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“with a measure of discretion given to the trial judge's application of the legal standard to the facts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Chansamone
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.