2002 UT App 323 - State v. Dean’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
July 2004
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Menzies · State v. Gibbons · State v. Ross · State v. Ostler · State v. Visser
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is well established under Utah law that we will presume harm ... when a trial court fails to inform a defendant of his constitutional rights under rule 11.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Mora
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.