Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2002 UT App 331 - American Fork City v. Singleton

2002 UT App 331 - American Fork City v. Singleton’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 2013
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Pena · Bartnicki v. Vopper · State v. Ramirez · Bailey v. Bayles · Texas v. Cobb

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is inappropriate for an appellate court ... to assume the role of weighing evidence and mak{e] its own findings of fact.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the trial court failed to make findings of fact or conclusions of law regarding whether there was probable cause to arrest”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Trial courts are given primary responsibility for making determinations of fact.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.