Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2002 UTAPP 348 - State v. Bradley

State v. Bradley’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
January 2026
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently January 2026

21 state decisions

90200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Huddleston v. United States · State v. Dunn · State v. Litherland · State v. Kelley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Evidence of other crimes, wrongs or acts is not admissible to prove the character of a person in order to show action in conformity therewith.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “First, a trial court must determine whether the bad acts evidence is being offered for a proper, non-character purpose, such as one of those specifically listed in rule 404(b). Second, the court must determine whether the prior bad acts evidence meets the requirements of rule 402. Third, the trial court must determine whether the prior bad acts evidence meets the requirements of rule 403.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[T]here was no evidence in the record of any alternative proof showing that [the defendant] committed offenses against [the two children] and had the intent to do so. There was no physical evidence of the offenses and there were no eyewitnesses to the offenses besides the child victims themselves.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.