State v. Chatwin’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently September 2020
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Hernandez v. New York · Taylor v. Louisiana · Purkett v. Elem · JEB v. Alabama Ex Rel. TB
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“offered [an] explanation for the peremptory challenge[] and the trial court has ruled on the ultimate question of intentional discrimination, the preliminary issue of whether the defendant has made a prima facie showing [as required under Bat-son's first step] becomes moot.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Absent a showing of clear error, we will not overturn a trial court's determination concerning the discriminatory intent embodied in a party's explanation for the exercise of a peremptory challenge.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“conclude as a matter of law that the trial court clearly erred in allowing the prosecutor to strike the [two] potential juror[s]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.