Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2002 UTAPP 384 - State v. Samora

State v. Samora’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
September 2004
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on North Carolina v. Pearce · United States v. Goodwin · Texas v. McCullough · State v. Dunn · State v. Holgate

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[the sentence itself was not illegal, but the manner in which it was imposed was contrary to law. Furthermore, allowing a harsher sentence when the original sentence was imposed in an illegal manner would have a 'chilling effect on the right to appeal'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “initial sentence ... was illegal because it was improperly imposed in [dlefendant's absence. That was precisely how the first appeal was argued. When we remanded the case, we expressly noted that the court may correct an illegal sentence at any time.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “'The court may correct an illegal sentence, or a sentence imposed in an illegal manner, at any time.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.