State v. Samora’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
September 2004
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on North Carolina v. Pearce · United States v. Goodwin · Texas v. McCullough · State v. Dunn · State v. Holgate
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[the sentence itself was not illegal, but the manner in which it was imposed was contrary to law. Furthermore, allowing a harsher sentence when the original sentence was imposed in an illegal manner would have a 'chilling effect on the right to appeal'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Samora“initial sentence ... was illegal because it was improperly imposed in [dlefendant's absence. That was precisely how the first appeal was argued. When we remanded the case, we expressly noted that the court may correct an illegal sentence at any time.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Samora“'The court may correct an illegal sentence, or a sentence imposed in an illegal manner, at any time.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Samora
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.